You could say there are three categories in which non-musicians can write about music: music journalism, music criticism, and music essays. Something Iโve learned in my years as a consumer and producer of music writing is that its level of value depends largely on who the reader is. In general, journalism and criticism are most useful to neophytes unfamiliar with the given musical subject, who are just getting into a band or wondering if a new release is worth a listen. Articles and reviews serve as invaluable touchstones for all of us to become fans โ but once youโre a seasoned devotee of whatever artist or genre, you reach a point where you know just as much or probably more than the average music hack. You can nitpick their ignorant misstatements about a bandโs lineup and discography, or rail against their clueless โ ยฝ rating of a brilliant album. At this stage, a matured fan can largely cast aside journalism and criticism like old training wheels.
On the other hand, personal music essays have the exact inverse relationship with the audience. If you want to write about what a given performerโs music means to you and detail your experiences as a fan, you pretty much need to assume your readers share in that fandom. Stories about that bandโs first concert you saw, or fond high-school summer memories from when that big song was popular, or hunting down that elusive import 12โ holy grail may make delightful reading for those who can relate, but theyโre more likely boring and self-indulgent in the eyes of the uninitiated. And sure, music essays can be just bad, period. But when theyโre good, theyโre a marvelous way to partly capture the ineffable joys of music in written words, to connect new insights and moments of recognition among your far-flung brothers and sisters of similar dispositions.
In his new book, The Duff Guide to 2 Tone, Stephen Shafer deftly does all three kinds of music writing: journalism, criticism and essays, all swirled together to a brisk skanking rhythm. The book largely consists of reviews and articles culled from Steveโs popular blog, The Duff Guide to Ska, which has covered ska and ska-related music since 2008. Being from New York, Steve shares a mission in common with us at Stateside Madness: appreciating music of Jamaican and British origins from an American point of view. The Duff Guide has been something of a role model for me in developing the SSM blog, so itโs been an honor for Steve to find us and give us a number of kind shoutouts in our first year on the scene.
The Duff Guide to 2 Tone is organized into sections covering the primary acts with singles and/or albums released on Jerry Dammersโ legendary 2 Tone Records: The Specials, Madness, The Selecter, The (English) Beat, Rico Rodriguez, The Bodysnatchers and Bad Manners, and a few choice โ2 Tone adjacentโ artists at the end. The result is one of those nice, sumptuous compendiums that you can flip through and read swatches of interest in whatever order you like. Thatโs an experience you canโt replicate by clicking links in a blog, giving me flashbacks to hours spent with my beloved Trouser Press Record Guide โ only here in an all-ska all-stars edition.
The Madness section covers the bandโs output from 2009 to 2019 quite comprehensively, including the Lee Thompson Ska Orchestra, โBullingdon Boysโ and the Before We Was We book. Steve gives a fine accounting of what Madness has been up to over the past decade, but like I said before, I really donโt need someone to tell me how good they think Oui Oui Si Si Ja Ja Da Da and Canโt Touch Us Now are. What I like reading most is Steveโs personal asides.
Though it may seem anathema for someone with my obvious bias, I found myself especially enchanted with Steveโs confession that he was never the hugest fan of Madness. In his ranking of the top 2 Tone acts back in the day, Madness came in at number four, with The Specials/The Special AKA being his big favorite. He explains that he was drawn to the strong political views expressed by the Dammers crew from Coventry (as well as The Beat and The Selecter), moreso than the comparatively sunny pop sensibilities of the Nutty Boys. Thatโs fair enough, an opinion shared by many of my friends who have showed appreciation for British ska. Americans tend to deem The Specials the โcoolestโ band in the genre, I know. But when The Liberty of Norton Folgate came along in 2009, Steve had to reconsider his former assessment.
โWhen it seemed like their 2 Tone peers had run out of things to say,โ he writes, โMadness were delivering the songs of great meaning that I had wanted from them in my youth โ a concept album that promotes multiculturalism as the only path to real freedom, and the notion that the history of a place and its people has an extraordinary impact on making this possible.โ This he follows with a thorough unpacking of โWe Are Londonโ and the epic title track, dissecting them with rigorous wonder. Itโs some of the finest Madness analysis Iโve ever read.
The Duff Guide to 2 Tone is chock full of personal fan nuggets that elevate it above a mere collection of record reviews. I relish Steveโs finding of the exceptionally rare Rico Jama LP. I envy him for seeing Pauline Black and Rhoda Dakar play together in New York City in 2019. I admire his heartfelt reflections on the occasion of Ranking Rogerโs passing. I relate to his interview with Roddy โRadiationโ Byers, whom I myself had the pleasure of chatting with at length before a North Carolina gig a couple of years ago. I love that Steve mentions his favorite album by The Beat is Whaโppen? No way, I think he and I must be the only two fans who share that oddball opinion! And indeed, his reviews have a thing or two to teach a crotchety old know-it-all like me โ for instance, I had vaguely heard of The Specialsโ Live at the Moonlight Club but never bought it. After reading Steveโs reverential praise for the 1979 bootleg-turned-legit release, I had to go grab it. Iโm sure glad I did. Thanks, buddy.
If I had to criticize one thing about The Duff Guide to 2 Tone, it would be the editorial presentation. The professional copy editor in me wishes I could have taken a pass at assembling the manuscript in a more orderly fashion. The reviews are largely in reverse chronological order for whatever reason, with miscellaneous essay and interview pieces coming at the end of each section. I would have arranged things more strictly from oldest to newest. I also would like to see a brief intro at the start of each new section profiling the given artist by listing their 2 Tone bona fides and outlining their career up to the point in 2008 when The Duff Guide blog began, just as orientation for newbies. Doing so wouldnโt require a lot of new writing. Prime example, the first review in The Bodysnatchers section starts with about three pages on their background, making a really excellent capsule recap of Rhoda Dakarโs body of work. You could just lift it out and have a nice Bodysnatchers preamble ready to go.
But Iโm probably just being too finicky and pedantic in my publishing ethos. A book as niche as The Duff Guide to 2 Tone is best aimed at full-fledged fans, those who already know their Price Buster from their Buster Bloodvessel โ and any interested novice worth their salt will accept a good challenge above their reading level. No doubt, Steve Shafer scores high marks as a music journalist, critic and essayist. Iโm more focused in my own ambitions here at Stateside Madness, favoring the “let me tell you my story” essay end of the spectrum, and in that capacity Iโm proud to have Steve as a virtual mentor of sorts and comrade-at-arms. Hereโs to hoping we can meet up for a super-nerdy fanboy conversation at a ska concert some fine day.
As a kid in the โ70s, I always hated American Bandstand. Not so much because of the music or Dick Clark, but because every week it marked the dreaded end of Saturday morning cartoons. After the final Schoolhouse Rock lesson of the day, when you heard Barry Manilow crooning about goinโ hoppinโ today, where things are poppinโ (pop) the Philadelphia way, you knew it was over. Time to switch off the TV and scrounge up something else to do. American Bandstand was for dumb teenagers like my sister, with their inscrutable critical judgment of whether the new K.C. & The Sunshine Band single had a good beat that you could dance to.
Aging into that demographic in the โ80s, I began to tune into the Bandstand now and again, especially when prompted by TV Guide that bands I liked were going to be on. I recall seeing favorites like Men at Work, the Go-Goโs, Big Country, General Public, Katrina and the Waves… and Madness.
When the boys turned up on Americaโs closest equivalent to Top of the Pops on March 3, 1984, it was a major event for me. They played (or more accurately, mimed) their current U.S. single โThe Sun and the Rainโ as well as โKeep Moving,โ title track from the just-released album. I was head-over-heels in love with the U.S. Keep Moving album, and seeing Madness promote it on American Bandstand served to validate my loyalty to the band as more than a one-hit wonder.
Presumably because of copyright enforcement, Bandstand performances are hard to find on YouTube. But there is a video clip from Dick Clarkโs 1984 interview with Madness, and itโs a right corker.
Analyzing this historical document, I first note how Dick addresses our dear frontman as Suggs McPherson (mispronounced like Elle McFEARson, to boot). This is what I always called him for many years: first name Suggs, last name McPherson. It wasnโt until his The Lone Ranger album in 1995 that I grokked that Suggs is properly a mononym. Tacking on his surname is like saying Cher Sarkisian or Bono Hewson. At the start and end of the interview you can spot Suggs doing his patented askew โglasses funny,โ a stage move he repeated ad nauseam during the โ90s reunion era. How odd it is to hear him say โWeโve known each other for about six years.โ Man, Iโm wearing socks older than that.
Asking about the bandโs notorious rendition of โGod Save the Queenโ on kazoos at the 1982 Prince Charles Trust Concert, Dick Clark randomly sticks his microphone in the face of the mustachioed trumpet player, and also his namesake, Dick Cuthell. Of course Cuthell wasnโt part of that royal command performance two years prior, but he gamely replies, โI didnโt have a kazoo at the time.โ
At this point the interview is rudely thrown into disarray by the unruly Lee Thompson. Clad in red longjohns, sunglasses and fingerless gloves festooned with M logos, Lee circles around Dick Clark like a jaguar stalking its prey, feigning a Benny Hill grab-and-miss at Clarkโs backside. Thommo settles down for a moment before going in for a second pass, and this time he hits the target, majorly. Although the camera is on Dick Cuthell at the moment of assault, as it were, itโs safe to say our Lee Jay Thompson indecently groped a beloved showbiz icon on national television.
โHave you no respect?โ Clark bellows in mock outrage, over whoops and hollers from the underage eyewitnesses. Iโve read some tabloidy accounts of the Kix-Dick-Goose incident claiming that Clark was infuriated and cursed out the band afterwards, but thatโs pretty clearly nonsense. Harmless fun was had by all, and Dick warmly thanks the band like theyโre friendly old acquaintances.
Which, in fact, they were.
At the tail end of the interview clip you can hear Dick say, โWeโre delighted to have you back.โ I did not realize until just recently that Madness first appeared on American Bandstand back in 1980! What, are you kidding me?
Yes, four years earlier, on April 19, 1980, our very young Nutty Boys capped off their second U.S. tour with an unlikely slot on the Bandstand. This was surely Madnessโs American television debut, and Iโm equally certain I didnโt see it broadcast. Their lipsynched performances of โOne Step Beyondโ and โMadnessโ are not to be found on YouTube, but once again the interview segment is.
Youโll catch that right off the bat, Lee pinches Dick Clarkโs inner thigh โ so clearly the manโs ageless derriรจre was an object of long-term enticement for Mr. Thompson. After that, Lee walks off camera and behaves himself for the remainder of the proceedings, leaving Mike and Carl to be the big cutups this time. As Dick questions Suggs about ska music, Barso angles for attention in the background with a bonkers โturkey neckโ move. Carl mugs for the camera, joins Mike in a brief turkey mating ritual, then busts out some trademark nutty dance moves. Chrissy Boy and Bedders swing their guitar necks (in lieu of their own) and impishly prance about to dial up the pandemonium, while Woody and Lee mind their own business. And all this went down on ABC television in the year 1980. Unreal.
I just canโt imagine how Madness got booked on American Bandstand back then. No hit songs, utterly unknown except in hip New York/California circles where they had toured and got minor college radio exposure. Sire Records must have had a superhumanly persuasive booking agent, or else the Bandstand had to scramble to fill a last minute cancellation by Sister Sledge. I would dearly love to see how the unsuspecting crowd of dancers reacted to Chas Smash shouting out โHey you! Donโt watch that, watch this!โ Iโd almost wager the showโs producers made them skip the intro and launch right into the song, lest the teenyboppers awkwardly stand by waiting for a good beat to dance to. What a strange little chapter in the bandโs primordial history.
It actually upends my personal narrative as a Madness fan, a bit. Iโve always believed and maintained that I didnโt get on the nutty train until โOur Houseโ was a hit in 1983 because I never had an opportunity to be exposed to Madness before that. But no. Thatโs all a lie now. I could have seen them on freaking Dick Clarkโs American Bandstand back in 1980! Dang it, what a near miss and epic fail!
You canโt excuse me for having been too young or too unsophisticated in taste, either. In January 1980, I saw the B-52s play โRock Lobsterโ on Saturday Night Live and became an instant fan at the tender age of 10, nearly a decade before โLove Shack.โ I was into weird and crazy music as a kid, and if Iโd seen Madness on TV at that juncture, I doubtless would have been set on my eventual path of musical appreciation much earlier in life.
What if, on that one pivotal Saturday afternoon, I had watched American Bandstand with my sister instead of going out to play with Star Wars figures? What if I had heard โOne Step Beyondโ and seen these hooligans clowning around with Dick Clark, talking about something mysterious called ska? What if them rockinโ on AB had led me straight to โRockinโ in Abโ? What if Iโd got my hands on The Rise and Fall right after its UK release, and โOur Houseโ was already an old favorite by the time U.S. radio got clued in?
What an interesting alternate history some precocious parallel universe me got to enjoy, madly accelerated. Still, Iโm happy enough with the way things played out. On a scale of 35 to 98, I rate it at least a 75.
The music of Madness has served as soundtracks and jingles in quite a lot of American TV commercials. We fondly recall the vintage kidsโ Colgate Pump ad, imported from the UK, which surely got more airplay here than โBaggy Trousersโ itself. (Anyone up for a sequel, โThe Liberty of Brushinโ Colgateโ?) Leviโs borrowed โIt Must Be Loveโ for a baffling pantomime of romantic devotion between a guy and his best… jeans? And of course โOur Houseโ has done its share of flogging U.S. brands, from a clever โJingle Bellsโ mashup for Verizon to a severely not-clever bastardization for Maxwell House.
Now thereโs a new โOur Houseโ ad for Scotts Miracle-Gro thatโs as surprising as it is timely. And it really does our band (house) proud. Take a look.
Created by New York agency VaynerMedia, the spot plays to our shared need for summertime fun during a global pandemic lockdown. The scenes of staycation festivities consist of real people, shot in backyards on their phones and cameras โ โuser generated content,โ as they say in the marketing biz. Scotts Miracle-Gro ads usually focus on gardening and landscaping, but the current situation inspired the company to think in broader terms of what our lawns mean to Americans. Theyโre not just the grass and trees outside, they are valued as part of โour house,โ and a safe haven where we make memories.
For Madness fans, whatโs really significant about the ad is the version of the song used. Itโs not the original hit single, and itโs not a cover version. Itโs Madness themselves, putting a more contemplative spin on โOur Houseโ from 2013. Itโs known as The Peopleโs Palace Version, recorded outside North Londonโs beloved Alexandra Palace with a chorus of fans as a gesture of thanks and appreciation to the bandโs loyal supporters.
That Ally Pally recording has always given me goosebumps, stirring my emotional connection to my Madhead brothers and sisters. Look, thereโs a woman wearing the same Madstock 2009 shirt I cherish from my first Madness show. I am one of them. This is my tribe. The only one thing I donโt love about this anthemic singalong is that it doesnโt include the whole of โOur House.โ And I tell you, I never in a million years would have guessed it would end up being broadcast in an American commercial.
Consider this: Other than the odd appearance on a U.S. talk show, or high-profile special events like the Olympics or an NFL game in London, this amounts to the first time a post-1980s Madness recording has been granted a mass American audience! Surely some ad creative at VaynerMedia must be a legit Madness fan, because I canโt imagine the Peopleโs Palace โOur Houseโ is well documented in Madison Avenue music licensing libraries.
Kudos to whoever made that call, because the ad works brilliantly. It doesn’t matter if the majority of viewers donโt realize thatโs Madness, the original artist, judging by the online comments about that melancholy โcover.โ Even if Suggs’ matured and mellowed voice carries zero recognition or nostalgia factor, look at all the universal buttons being surgically punched. Father, mother, sister, brother, the kids are playing. British Madness fan voices transfigured into a surrogate choir of American families. Abundant summer fun without the beach or the highways or the Disneyland. Right in our own backyards, thereโs always something happening and itโs usually quite loud. We remember way back then when everything was true and when we would have such a very good time, such a fine time. Such a happy time.
Which is exactly what we all need once again, right now.
Beyond Madness, my second favorite British act of all time is Paul Weller. Relations have been friendly and collegial among them over the decades, dating back to Weller citing โEmbarrassmentโ as an inspiration for the Motown beat of The Jamโs โTown Called Malice.โ Of particular note, while working as an early โ90s A&R rep at Go! Discs, Carl Smyth helped Weller launch his solo career. In the past year, Weller joined Madness on stage at House of Common 2019 to great acclaim, and he guested on Suggsโs Love Letters to London BBC Radio 4 series, which saw the pair of them duetting on โNobodyโs Foolโ by Ray Davies.
And now Lee Thompson has turned in a guest spot on Wellerโs high-profile new album. On Sunset went straight in at #1 in the UK, giving Weller the accomplishment of topping the album chart in five consecutive decades, a feat matched only by Lennon and McCartney. Thereโs no American angle in reporting this Weller and Thompson collaboration (safe to say On Sunset isnโt making history in the U.S. charts), but when anyone from Madness teams up with one of my other musical heroes, you better believe Stateside Madness will have something to say about it!
Thommo contributes a laid-back sax solo on the Weller-penned track โWalkinโ.โ Paul has been enthusiastic in his praise for Leeโs work. โIโve seen Lee playing blinders in recent years, both with Madness and with his Ska Orchestra. Heโs a terrific player.โ
Have a listen to โWalkinโโ (Lee comes in around 1:38.)
So what do I think? Honestly, itโs a bit disappointing. The song isnโt the most interesting on the album, and it sounds a lot like a reworking of โHereโs the Good Newsโ from 2005โs As Is Now (which wasnโt one of the most interesting on that album, either). Probably unfairly, I had imagined this would amount to something more like Leeโs brilliant guest sax on The Specialsโ โHey, Little Rich Girl,โ where itโs 100% that inimitable Lee Jay Kix Thompson sound, whereas the โWalkinโโ solo could be any decent session player.
I believe my reaction to On Sunset has suffered from too much anticipation and advance buildup. This is also the case with the 7-minute opening track โMirror Ball,โ which has been hyped as an epic creative watershed in every Weller article and interview for the past year, but hits me โ as much as it pains me to say โ as a boring swing and a miss. (Apologies, Paul.)
But new songs do often need to grow on you, and I will say that Iโm warming up to โWalkinโโ the more I listen to it. Itโs no masterpiece, but itโs a nice, breezy, easygoing summer tune. Iโm happy Lee Thompson played on it. This partnership between Weller and Thommo gives me hope that someday Iโll get my fantasy wish of hearing Paul belt out a cover of a certain old Madness tune he rated back in the day. That one what Lee wrote.
In the course of their intimate Two Mad Men and a String Quartet performance shared online June 6, Suggs and Mike Barson debuted two new Madness songs. โTheatre of the Absurd,โ a Suggs composition, appears to be a spiritual sequel to his solo track โThe Greatest Show on Earthโ with a more somber tone. The other new tune is of particular interest to us at Stateside Madness, for reasons Barso outlined in his introduction:
โThis song is about the dire straits over the pond at the moment. No, not really at the moment. Itโs a song about our cousins in America, yeah. Leaders of the world. And where theyโre leading us, who knows?โ
Running just over 90 seconds, โAll the Presidentโs Menโ is a terse meditation on social and political turmoil in recent U.S. history, mourning the current tattered state of the American dream. Barson borrows the title from the Woodward & Bernstein exposรฉ on Watergate (and the subsequent Redford & Hoffman film adaptation), which originated as an allusion the irreparable injury following Humpty Dumptyโs fall.
The song is bracingly relevant in the context of international protests in response to the death of George Floyd. The mood and message beautifully fit the string quartet format, and an eventual studio recording could likely prove to have a similar sparse arrangement. A fantastic new piece of work to suit our troubled times.
The year was 1963 The last one for Kennedy In โ68 the Lorraine Motel On the balconyย Where the Doctor fell From a single shell
A last shot at democracyย Shining city on a hill Land of the freeย Seventeen agenciesย Looking out for thee The NSA and Homeland Securityย
A shot rang outย The sound of gunfire echoes โcross the mall The future sucked into a dark black hole Short-sighted small minds clamour for control
But thereโs no dream no more Psyops are now running the score And the money trickles upwards evermoreย Youโd almost think it was 1984
American Madness fans have always got the short end of the stick. Sporadic tours, loads of music unreleased on U.S. labels, and our general suffering from the bandโs local reputation as a novelty โ80s one-hit wonder. But there is one notable category in which only the U.S. (and Canada) got the very best version of Madness. Because the North American edition of the 1984 Keep Moving album is infinitely superior to the original British release in every possible way. Fight me.
But before we step into the bloody ska-octagon to duke it out, let me rewind. Prior to Keep Movingโs appearance, โOur Houseโ had made me a Madness fan, and I had tracked down the bandโs domestic and imported back catalogue. In this interval I wondered what the future might hold for Madness. Would they go back to being an exclusively British phenomenon? I recall telling a friend my anxiety over possibly โlosingโ my new favorite band if they didnโt have more U.S. hits. โDo you think theyโll try again?โ I asked with trepidation. At this point I would have had no idea of Mike Barsonโs impending departure or the bandโs internal tensions, but for some unfounded reason I feared there may not be a next Madness album.
Then one Saturday night in early 1984, as I watched Night Tracks on SuperStation TBS, I caught an unfamiliar piano melody being pounded out by an absurdly long-armed fellow. The piano spontaneously exploded, a distinctive rhythm section joined in, and my shocked brain sputtered โWait, could this be Madness?โ when Suggs McPherson himself appeared, singing in the rain with his sunglasses on. The music video credits gave me the lowdown:
MADNESS โThe Sun and the Rainโ Keep Moving Geffen Records
Whoa! An unexpected new Madness song! A new Madness video! And better yet, a whole new Madness album! Unreal! I was so overwhelmed with sensory bombardment that I could barely absorb the song. All that registered was lyrics about inclement weather, that killer Barson piano riff, and the band wearing red bodysuits inside a mockup of Suggsyโs hollow head. How thrilling to see proof that Madness was indeed trying America again. One might say they were resolved to keep moving.
The next morning I mentioned to my dad that Madness had a new album out and I was anxious to hunt for it. I figured weโd need to run to Camelot Music in Hendersonville, where I had bought the One Step Beyond / Absolutely double cassette. Daddy ended up running some errands on his own that day, and to my surprise he called home from Pretzelโs Records in nearby Canton. He said heโd found a Madness tape at the store and wanted to make sure it was the right one. Yep, Keep Moving! That phone call was an unusual gesture from my dad, so I must have made a major impression about desperately I wanted this Madness tape. Teenage whining pays off sometimes.
Oh, how delighted I was with Keep Moving! This was my first time getting a new Madness album upon its release, and it was spectacular. The one reservation I had at first was that the style of the vocals was now… different. Suggs had begun crooning, with a velvety tone all whispery and soft around the edges, compared to his cockney croak from early Madness. Carl got more honey-throated too, on โMichael Caineโ and โVictoria Gardens.โ Initially I thought their smoothed-out serenading sounded a tad posh and phony, but I soon accepted it as a natural consequence of maturity.
Thatโs really the defining character of Keep Moving: rich, complex, sophisticated. Less zany and madcap, more artistic without veering into pretentious, still genuine and fun. A mature Madness. I found Keep Moving to be better than 7 and The Rise and Fall, and today it still ranks in my top three alongside One Step Beyond and Absolutely. The finest Madness albums have a consistent level of creative quality, no clunky fillers, each song building strength upon strength in a harmonious flow. The cover of the cassette stated โContains two bonus songs not available on LP,โ and even those were good. Altogether, 14 lovely tracks that belong right where they are.
I finally got to hear โWings of a Dove,โ which had been intriguingly mentioned as their new UK single in a Trouser Press article. Madness plus steel drums plus hallelujah gospel choir? Totally loved it. The music video for that track became a lot more widely played in the U.S. than โThe Sun and the Rain,โ finding heavy rotation on Nickelodeonโs Nick Rocks video program. I remember their credits subtitled the song as โWings of a Dove (A Celebrity Song)โ instead of Celebratory. I think the gimmick with the van parachuting out of the plane helped to sustain the faint impression of Madness in the American consciousness, at least among teens and tweens.
Funny thing about โVictoria Gardensโ โ listening to it, I thought the chorus sounded kinda like The English Beat, whose What Is Beat? greatest hits I had recently got. The liner notes cryptically credited โGeneral Public: Back Vox,โ which I thought literally meant they had recorded strangers off the street. It was a few months later that a catchy single called โTendernessโ hit the airwaves, I learned the name of Dave Wakeling and Ranking Rogerโs new band, and the penny dropped.
Keep Moving has always been my Madness album for Sundays. Maybe in part since I actually got it on a Sunday, but mainly because it has that relaxed, easygoing lazy Sunday afternoon mood. Certainly compared to the caffeinated jump of most of their other records, Keep Moving is the one to chill out to. The album also has a pleasantly old-timey sound thatโs hard to put in words. It reminds me of idyllic 19th century paintings of gents in barbershop quartet outfits on pennyfarthing bicycles and ladies with parasols strolling through the park, especially โBrand New Beat,โ โMarch of the Gherkinsโ and โProspects.โ These are not typical pop songs of the โ80s. They are from another time. I remember many times mowing the yard with Keep Moving on my Walkman, and laughing to myself, โMan, no other kid in North Carolina is playing this kind of music.โ I was proud to be weird, and still am.
Years later, when compact discs came along, I was in for a long-overdue discovery. Getting a batch of Madness import CDs through mail order, I found to my dismay that the songs on Keep Moving were totally screwed up. And the two biggest songs, the ones with the great music videos, werenโt even on there at all! What the hell? What kind of lousy botched job had I got cheated on? Ridiculous!
And thatโs when I figured it out. The original official Keep Moving had a totally different running order than the one I knew and loved. Most significantly, โThe Sun and the Rainโ and โWings of a Dove,โ which had been released as UK singles in 1983, were not included on the album. This was the dreadful truth. The real โtwo bonus songsโ included on my Geffen cassette werenโt โTime for Teaโ and โWaltz into Mischiefโ at all. AAAarrrghghhh! NOOOOOOO!
Well, damn. All I can say is that whoever the Geffen executive or producer was who assembled and packaged their release of the album, they were a total genius. They didnโt just arbitrarily scramble the running order, they clearly put constructive strategy behind it. Because like I said, the North American edition of Keep Moving album is infinitely superior to the original British release in every possible way. Just take a look.
๐ฌ๐ง 1. Keep Moving
๐บ๐ธ 1. Keep Moving
๐ฌ๐ง 2. Michael Caine
๐บ๐ธ 2. Wings of a Dove (A Celebratory Song)
๐ฌ๐ง 3. Turning Blue
๐บ๐ธ 3. The Sun and the Rain
๐ฌ๐ง 4. One Better Day
๐บ๐ธ 4. Brand New Beat
๐ฌ๐ง 5. March of the Gherkins
๐บ๐ธ 5. March of the Gherkins
๐ฌ๐ง 6. Waltz into Mischief
๐บ๐ธ 6. Michael Caine
๐ฌ๐ง 7. Brand New Beat
๐บ๐ธ 7. Time for Tea*
๐ฌ๐ง 8. Victoria Gardens
๐บ๐ธ 8. Prospects
๐ฌ๐ง 9. Samantha
๐บ๐ธ 9. Victoria Gardens
๐ฌ๐ง 10. Time for Tea
๐บ๐ธ 10. Samantha
๐ฌ๐ง 11. Prospects
๐บ๐ธ 11. One Better Day
๐ฌ๐ง 12. Give Me a Reason
๐บ๐ธ 12. Give Me a Reason
๐บ๐ธ 13. Turning Blue
๐บ๐ธ 14. Waltz into Mischief* * U.S. cassette only
โKeep Moving,โ โWings of a Dove,โ โThe Sun and the Rain.โ Boom, thatโs an epic trilogy of an album opener. Iโve heard UK fans remark that the two singles clash with the tone of the album and donโt belong. Nonsense. I think they mesh splendidly with the band’s refined new sound.
The last fading notes of โBrand New Beatโ ring in โMarch of the Gherkinsโ without a pause, like โHeartbreakerโ segues into โLiving Loving Maid,โ or โSgt. Pepperโs Lonely Hearts Club Bandโ into โWith a Little Help from My Friends.โ Separating them is sheer folly.
โMichael Caineโ gets a comfortable buildup before its cinematic atmosphere unfolds. Itโs a good song, but I donโt think shoulders the weight of the albumโs #2 position. Sharing a sense of spy novel intrigue, โTime for Teaโ feels right as an off-kilter epilogue.
โProspectsโ is a quintessential Side 2 starter, resetting the table for the albumโs next movement. The songโs languid outro nicely tees up Dave and Rogerโs merry bounce into โVictoria Gardens.โ
The brooding โSamanthaโ turns the corner into the dark heart of Keep Moving, leading off a suite of four minor-key-type tunes that mean serious business. The emotional catharsis of โOne Better Day,โ the suspense-thriller soundtrack climax of โGive Me a Reason,โ the urgent denouement of โTurning Blue.โ
โWaltz into Mischiefโ supplies the much-needed cooldown and signoff, as a raucous pint-raising singalong chorus gives way to chuffed strings and brass winding down to a stop.
I just canโt listen to the UK Keep Moving. It doesnโt make sense to me, and the beautiful flow is not there. Itโs amazing how much difference the sequencing of songs can make. When I gained the technology to burn my own CDs, the first thing I did was create a disc of the American Keep Moving. Geffen eventually issued it on CD in the U.S., thank goodness, almost matching the old cassette but with โTime for Teaโ inserted as track 13 instead of track 6. Not perfect, but close enough to be serviceable.
All that being said, and as much as I relish chanting โUSA! USA!โ in this specific context, I freely admit that itโs all subjective. When a creative work comes in multiple variants, in films or books or music, youโll always prefer the version that you fell in love with, whether it was the original or altered or what. Iโve actually had the exact same experience with another landmark British pop album from 1984: Iโm biased toward the Style Councilโs American My Ever Changing Moods album, even though Paul Weller fans almost unanimously revere the original Cafรฉ Bleu. Fair play to all the other Madness fans who likewise feel their treasured edition of Keep Moving is flawless and unbeatable.
To borrow a phrase from the pen of Lee Thompson: Star-shaped badges that shine around, called โWings of a Doveโ and โThe Sun and the Rain,โ come free in your U.S. Keep Moving bumper pack. But if a different tracklist is left around too long, itโll burn right through to your heart and your soul.
Trouser Press was a legendary U.S. alternative rock magazine published from 1974 to 1984, perhaps best known for its comprehensive Trouser Press Record Guide books. The following is a fantastic article by Jim Green that ran as the cover feature in the magazineโs penultimate issue dated December 1983/January 1984.ย
This was the single most memorable and important piece of journalism I read on Madness in my first year as a fan. It taught me a lot of the fundamentals of the Madness backstory (how they got their name, the 2 Tone connection, Carlโs evolving role) and gave a peek into how the sausage of the Geffen U.S. album was made (how traumatizing for Suggs to spit โI donโt like itโ!). This was the first time I ever heard of their โcurrent British single, โWings of a Dove,โโ many long months before I would actually hear the song. And in retrospect, how amusing indeed to see young Suggs decry the horrific notion of a Madness concept album with 14-minute songs. So please enjoy this fine Trouser Press profile, in its transience and in its permanence…
The transatlantic telephone line is dominated by the muffled distortion and hiss common to calls made across a thousand leagues of water; the voice at the other end also cuts off intermittently for split-second intervals. At one point, though, the speaker obviously pauses, as if to gather his thoughts on a subject he rarely discusses, at least not with the press.
โโThe image of the band is itself almost as strong as the music, if not more memorable, to the average person,โ says Graham McPherson. He is referring to Madness, the group in which he is lead vocalist (and, true to form, in which role he is far better known as โSuggsโ).
โI donโt know if itโs right or not,โ he continues hesitantly, โbut musically weโve been looked on as something instant, not really worthy of analysis.โ
Nobody would argue that, least of all McPhersonโs bandmates โย until the release of the septetโs fourth British album, The Rise and Fall. Madness has moved into new musical and lyrical ground, with the fullest realization of their capabilities to date. Yet the record incurred critical brickbats from the British music press, which characterized it as depressing, and โ unkindest cut of all? โ โsaid you couldnโt put most of the songs from it on the jukebox.โ
What a switch from the days when Madness was branded too frivolous and lacking in the โsocially relevantโ virtues of the other outfits with which it was lumped: Selecter, the Beat and the Specials. (The last were the so-called vanguard of neo-ska and proprietors of the 2 Tone label on which the others got their starts.) But Madness has rarely received comment from the Britpress, positive or negative, that hasnโt been based on one prejudgment or another.
That the group suddenly matured isnโt, in the membersโ own eyes, deserving of celebration by the press. Nor do they seek the critical scrutiny and interpretation inflicted on artists like Elvis Costello or even the Jam. They just want a fair shake.
If McPherson, bassist Mark Bedford and guitarist Chris Foreman (the latter two available to chat during this summerโs US tour) are representative of their bandmates, one of Madnessโs most salient characteristics is a distinct lack of self-consciousness. Madness most likely would have entered the 2 Tone graveyard long ago if theyโd been more calculating than what theyโve always been: a bunch of friends who like making music together.
Mark Bedford: โIf anything, weโre more influenced by outside sources now than when we started. Back thenโ โ when they were mostly in their late teens โ โwe, like most kids, thought we knew it all; no-one could tell us anything.โ
When Madness started, as the North London Invaders in 1978, there was no โmovementโ or trend. The band did what they enjoyed, even if few pubs encouraged them.
Another band called the Invaders (from West Yorkshire) staked a claim on the name, necessitating a switch. No one was satisfied with Morris & the Minors (a pun on a British automobile). Then Foreman suggested rechristening the group after one of their songs. As a jokey example he mentioned โMadnessโ; Prince Busterโs โ60s ska hit was a keynote of their set.
To Foremanโs dismay, the others leapt on it at once. โI didnโt like it,โ he says. โI thought it was the kind of thing for an Alice Cooper-type band. But it stuck.โ
McPherson now is bemused by the groupโs youthfully naive รฉlan in those days. โLike anybody, you donโt really imagine or realize that youโll be a great success. We always knew, when we were young, that anything we did would be brilliant. Every time we played we expected everyone to go mad, but it didnโt go beyond an immediate enthusiasm for impressing people, as opposed to becoming nationally successful.โ
In early 1979 the Specials created 2 Tone and garnered lots of attention. When word got out that they were looking for other groups to put on their label, Madness jumped at the chance. โWe sent them a cassette โ a rehearsal tape, really,โ Foreman says, grimacing.
โJerry Dammers [the head Special] still has it!โ Bedford laughs. โHe told me he still listens to it once in a while and has a laugh.โ
Still, Dammers and company heard something of merit in it. By September, Madness was enjoying its first bit with its tribute to Buster, โThe Prince.โ
โWe werenโt mugs,โ Foreman asserts. โWe wanted to get an album out right away.โ
โWe wanted to do it with 2 Tone,โ Bedford adds, โbut [the Specials] only had money enough to do their own album.โ
Label shopping resulted in their signing to Stiff. An LP, One Step Beyond, was quickly recorded and followed its namesake single into the UK Top 10; the album went platinum during its 64-week chart residency.
Other bit singles followed. Madnessโs albums sold even better than most of their 45s, but English pundits jeered the group for being a โsingles bandโ โ as if that somehow cheapened the success. Image problems persisted. Madness suffered in the aforementioned comparisons with their former 2 Tone mates (or, for that matter, whichever โseriousโ new world-beaters were current press favorites).
โWe never said, โWeโre a ska band,โโ Foreman claims. โWe never put those limits on what we were doing.โ
โThatโs musical suicide, sooner or later,โ Bedford says.
โOther people lumped us into that but we didnโt mind; we knew what we could do,โ Foreman adds. โCalling our music the โNutty Soundโ was a way to avoid categorizing ourselves. โNuttyโ was just a word Lee [saxman Thompson] used a lot, and someone picked up on it.โ
The โNutty Boysโ might have smacked all too much of bubblegum-style merchandising, but even skeptics found it hard not to be taken in by Madnessโs wacky antics in front of movie or video cameras. The group released a semi-autobiographical feature film, Take It or Leave It, in October, 1981, and then Complete Madness, a compendium of videos with added linkage and a pair of their Japanese TV commercials thrown in for good measure. And they remained overwhelmingly popular in the UK.
What could be wrong? Gradually, band members got married โ notably McPherson to songstress Bette Bright, and drummer Dan โWoodyโ Woodgate to ex-Mo-dettes bassist Jane Crockford โ and started families. But something was brewing.
Bedford admits the marriages have crimped Madnessโs former camaraderie. And he and Foreman are both less than pleased with the bandโs third album, Seven (despite its spawning โHouse of Fun,โ Madnessโs first Number One single).
McPherson remembers the situation more clearly: โI was satisfied with Seven, but the others werenโt. We didnโt have the best feeling when we recorded it, in Nassau in the Bahamas; I think we were pressinโ down there, which was very strange.
โIt started feeling very professional. That side of things was becoming more prevalent than with the previous two albums, where it was pure luck we were there at all.
โClive [Langer] and Alan [Winstanley], our producers all along, became scapegoats since they were in control of the proceedings.
โAfter we got back to London we were thinking of trying other producers. We met Trevor Horn, whom no one got along with. It made us realize how good Clive and Alan are as communicators, apart from everything else. It brought us closer together again.โ
Madness then created their best album by far. What made the difference?Just a better atmosphere while it was being recorded?
Bedford and Foreman mention that the bandโs working up different arrangements of the same number had a key effect. McPherson puts that new (for Madness) technique into a larger context.
โI think we realized that maybe we had been restricting ourselves, just like any bunch of kids will do. Itโs like we werenโt โallowedโ to do certain things; none of us would have grown a beard, for instance, and musically it was probably the same. Certain things were โuncool,โ like to do introspective stuff. The Rise and Fall was generally more thought out. Itโs the first album weโve made thatโs an album, not a collection of songs.โ
Indeed. Would you believe a Madness concept album?
โIt was gonna be about the rise and fall of a normal person in a particular area that was falling into bad times. โRise and Fall,โ โPrimrose Hill,โ โSunday Morningโ and โBlue Skinned Beastโ were all linked together. But as other songs started to be written, it kind of lost its way. We realized you had to write songs to fill in bits of the story, to keep it moving, but that they might not be very good or able to stand on their own.โ McPherson sighs at the thought of โ14-minute songsโ and such โ heaven forfend!
The way the album jelled reveals the vital interaction of Madnessโs members. Foreman and keyboardist Mike Barson have long been the songwriting mainstays as well as musical arrangers; Bedford, whoโs now writing less, is getting into technical aspects.
โI saw him reading a technical book on engineering,โ McPherson says, โand heโs produced singles by two bands, Bonsai Forest and Strawberry Switchblade. Now at least one of us understands whatโs going on at that end of things.โ
โWoody docs the sleeping for the band,โ Bedford jokes, while pointing out that Woodgate did write โSunday Morning.โ McPherson mentions that everyone has taken a more active interest in writing โ collaborating more than ever โ and arranging.
โThatโs part of the reason weโve stayed together,โ he explains. โThereโs no pressure on any one person to think of a concept or do all the songs.โ
The piece of the Madness puzzle thatโs fallen into place is vocalist and trumpet player Carl Smyth โ best remembered by early American fans of the group as the zany seventh member, โChas Smash.โ
Smyth got involved with Madness as a friend whose dance antics and vocal hijinks (heโs the voice on โOne Step Beyondโ) were worked into the group. But he seemed something of a fifth (or in this case seventh) wheel; he doesnโt appear on the cover of the first album.
โThere was a funny period just after One Step Beyond that Carl didnโt have much to do with,โ McPherson says. โHe was a member of the band, but he wasnโt really involved with anybody else โ particularly me, because weโre both singers. We talked about it between ourselves, and it must have been strange for him; I think he felt he was sort of outside us, yet felt changing that would be pushing me out. He didnโt push his position โcause he didnโt know what it was. But we decided that whoever had the right thing, be it words or music or singing, weโd do whatever seemed right.โ
Smythโs enthusiasm is evidently catching. โHeโll have a million ideas when we start talking about videos,โ McPherson says, โanother million when weโre getting things together for it, and when weโre actually doing it heโll have a million more. Itโs like he had something bottled up in him and suddenly the cork sprang out. Heโs brilliant. We probably wouldnโt be here if he wasnโt like he was, because out of every million ideas come 10 really good ones.
โAnd heโs always thinking of dance routines we can do, or whatever. If things start flagging a bit, heโll pick us up.โ
Now known within the group as โMr. Bosh,โ Smyth reverted to his given name for songwriting credits. Since co-writing โCardiac Arrest,โ a hit single on Seven, Smyth has made several important contributions โ notably co-writing โOur Houseโ (โCarl lives in one very much like that,โ Foreman says), โTomorrowโs Just Another Dayโ and the current British single, โWings of a Dove.โ
Madness fans got a bonus with the British single version of โTomorrowโs Just Another Dayโ: a guest lead vocal by Elvis Costello.
โIโd heard an old rockabilly song,โ McPherson says, โwhich started out with a bluesy version, then faded out and back in to a rocked-up arrangement. I thought itโd be great to have something like that on โTomorrowโs Just Another Dayโ โ an arrangement that sounded old and bluesy, just 20 seconds at the beginning of the song, and then cross-fading into the newer version, which weโd already done.
โThe backing track was cut, slowed down a bit and quite good. But I couldnโt come to grips with real singing. So Carl had a go; he did a good version, jazzed up a bit in the phrasing, but it still didnโt sound quite right.
โBy that time weโd finished the album and still had this backing track. Clive was soon going to be producing the new Elvis Costello album, and I think Chris suggested he ask Elvis to try it. He was really good; came in, did it and left. If he hadnโt, weโd still have that backing track sitting around! I think it was one of the best vocals heโs ever done.โ Perhaps in deference to Madness, Costello sang with a British accent, which he also tried out on Punch the Clock.
In the US, Sire Records had released One Step Beyond and its follow-up, Absolutely; both albums promptly died the death. Sire didnโt bother with Seven, but Madness, hugely successful everywhere else, wasnโt too concerned. โWe didnโt tum our back on America, really,โ Foreman says. โWe just kind of forgot about it.โ
According to Geffen Records A&R man Danny Heaps, however, US labels didnโt forget about Madness โ especially as the group racked up hit after hit in England and Europe. In early 1983, Heaps says, Madness approached Geffen โ a hot new company that had just started the last time the band had an American release.
โThey were a logical signing. Remember, at that time Dexyโs was number one here. And you know, that stuff about Madness being โtoo Englishโ for the US is nonsense.โ
โWe picked Geffen for the same reasons we signed with Stiff,โ Bedford says, โbecause of the people we talked to. They accepted us for what we are โ not saying, โYouโre great but youโll have to do this and you ought to do that.โโ
Geffen released Madness, a compilation drawn mostly from The Rise and Fall but digging as far back as the first album.
โI donโt like it,โ McPherson states. โItโs a scrapbook, not an album.โ
Foreman is more philosophic. โProgramming the album that way is, well, the way things are done for the US. I didnโt used to feel this way about it, but now I realize it has to be.โ
Heaps argues that Geffenโs track selection, โinstead of putting out all of The Rise and Fall, was purely commercial logic. The stuff from Seven, which includes singles, has never been out here โ and โNight Boat to Cairoโ [from One Step Beyond] is just a track someone in the company really wanted on there. We wanted to put on โMadnessโ or โThe Prince,โ but the group would allow only so much of our delving into the past.โ
The โcommercial logicโ paid off. Madness has sold over 200,000 copies, and spun off two hit singles: the Top 10 โOur Houseโ and a version of Labi Siffre’s โIt Must Be Love.โ
Future plans? Typically, McPherson chuckles and quips that heโs anxious to โhave some of the stew that my beautiful wifeโs knockinโ up on the cooker.โ More seriously, heโs looking ahead to the next Madness album. Recording began last spring, before an American tour, and resumed this autumn.
โBefore we recorded The Rise and Fall,โโ Bedford says, โthe mood of the country was pretty grey.โ He mentions Britainโs economy and the Falklands war, referred to in โBlue Skinned Beastโ โ dead soldiers were put into blue body bags. In contrast, Madnessโs spring studio session were much more uptempo.
โWeโre looking out for our more introspective tendencies,โโ McPherson says, โeven though weโre not sure weโve been going into them that heavily, so we can balance that with our more flamboyant side.โ
Madness getting self-conscious? Losing artistic innocence? Maybe… and maybe not. McPherson still believes in group dynamics.
โThe Rise and Fall succeeded because there was so much collaboration. Everyone had to stay interested, or we wouldnโt know what was going on the record! People change and grow together when they get so intensely involved. I think we were all in the same groove, the same vein, when we made that record.โ
Thatโs what he thinks makes Madness yield up its best work: democratic anarchy.
Back when I was a newly minted Madness fan, after โOur House,โ One Step Beyond and Absolutely had won me over, I found myself on the horns of an international crisis. Pop journalism informed me that the band had another two full albums to its credit: 7 from 1981, and The Rise and Fall from 1982. But since Sire Records had dropped Madness before their big 1983 hit, those two most recent records remained the stuff of legend in the United States. That didnโt stop me from checking the โMโ section at every record store in obsessive-compulsive vain, though I knew the search was going to require purveyors of exotic imported goods. And I would have to deal not only in foreign commodities, but also with a foreign format: the vinyl LP.
In all my music-loving life, I have never been a vinyl person. I did grow up in a home with a turntable, and my parents had a decent stack of country music LPs stashed in the closet by the likes of Conway Twitty, Hank Snow and Dolly Parton. But I never remember Mom and Dad playing records. They always just listened to the radio. My older sister had her vinyl collection with The Carpenters, Neil Sedaka and Frampton Comes Alive!, which of course she never wanted me messing with. I was raised on 8-track tapes and later cassettes. Only rarely did I ever own anything on vinyl beyond kiddie records. I demanded for my folks to get me the Kiss Alive II double LP, only because someone brought a copy to school and showed off all the cool scratch-off tattoos and goodies that didnโt come with the cassette. And I had a few odd 45 rpm singles like โOur Lips Are Sealedโ by the Go-Goโs (major crush on Belinda Carlisle) and โRaptureโ by Blondie (which I got by mailing in Pop-Tarts box tops).
Frankly, I just never liked vinyl. The sound was all crackly and prone to skipping. It was a pain to flip the record over. They were so fragile and easy to wreck with a single scratch or stray wisps of dust. Vinyl lovers extoll the โwarmth and richnessโ of the โsuperior dynamic analogโ whatever, and more power to โem. They can take those old records off the shelf and sit and listen to โem by themselves. In my book, tapes sounded way better than phonograph platters then, and well-mastered compact discs sound way better now. Yep, I think vinyl sucks.
But if I ever wanted to obtain the elusive 7 and The Rise and Fall as a teenager, I was going to have to settle for the import LPs. With a bit of work, I ended up scoring them both. Looking back now, I see evidence that Stiff Records did in fact release them on cassette, which would have been a blessing beyond imagination to my younger self. I gather that the market share for cassettes was quite smaller in the UK than in America, and in my music collecting experience I canโt recall ever seeing, in person, import cassettes by artists I like. Youโd have to turn to our friends at Retro Madness to procure such rare museum-class artifacts.
I actually found The Rise and Fall first, to make my reversed timeline of Madness catalogue discovery all the more knotty. The bandโs fourth album turned up at an eclectic record shop in Asheville, North Carolina. It may have been a used copy, but if so it was in nice condition. Of course I was amazed to lay my lucky hands on it, but not unreservedly thrilled. For one thing, by that point we no longer had a record player in my house. Either weโd gotten rid of the old turntable for some reason, or my sister had taken it when sheโd moved out. On top of that, I thought the price on the LP was outrageous. I donโt recall how much exactly, but it was probably around $15 โ exorbitant by my financial standards at the time. The very idea of shelling out twice the cost of an average cassette tape, for a record I couldnโt even play at home, and half of whose songs I already had on the Geffen compilation? Sworn to Madness allegiance though I was, it was still a bitter pill to gulp down.
Stirring further consternation was a little grocery-store-style sticker on the back of the LP sleeve: โMADE IN SPAIN.โ Whoa! An import not from Englandโs mountains green, but shipped all the way from the land of tapas and toreros! It bore the Stiff Records label, though the fine print specified โEditado por Discos Victoria, S.A,, distribuido por Edigsa.โ With grave concern I went to ask the shop clerk: โIf this recordโs made in Spain, will the singing still be in English?โ He assured me with amusement it would be. Itโs a good thing I was unaware of โUn Paso Adelanteโ at that point. ยกAy, caramba!
So I purchased my Spanish-but-not-Espaรฑol Madness record and took it to my auntโs house to give it a first listen, before getting a friend to make a good cassette recording on his stereo system. I recall my first impression was… underwhelmed. I could see why Geffen had fashioned a compilation for U.S. listeners instead of issuing The Rise and Fall. Tracks like โMr Speaker (Gets the Word)โ and โNew Delhiโ just arenโt very strong. โSunday Morningโ is charming enough, but it comes across as a less successful variation on the same themes as โOur House.โ (Probably as evidence that only Chas and Woody contributed songs about their upbringings, per the albumโs original concept.)
I was more impressed with the clever verbosity of โTiptoesโ (rhyming โthe doorโs already shuttingโ with โto reach the 19th buttonโ!) and the unusual musical structure of โThat Face.โ To me, Mike Barsonโs piano and Mark Bedfordโs bass are the quintessential elements of the Madness sound, and itโs remarkable how โThat Faceโ arranges their parts in minimalistic bursts that create both tension and airiness in the gaps between. Itโs a mature new style that points toward the direction of Keep Moving.
In my 11th grade English class, we had an assignment to present a song of our choice to the class and analyze its lyrics like poetry. Mrs. Caldwell told us to find songs with more artistic or social relevance than โbaby baby letโs partyโ or whatever. I chose to discuss โAre You Coming (With Me)โ and dissect its bleak message of trying to reach a self-destructive friend in the throes of drug addiction. Looking back, I wonder why I didnโt pick some other Madness tune like โEmbarrassmentโ โ another Lee Thompson composition with a meaningful story behind it, and a catchier melody. I believe in part I liked the idea of playing this tape recorded from a super obscure record that none of my captive audience would ever hear otherwise. And it was an opportunity to show that my favorite band could do something more serious and soulful than that โhouse in the middle of the streetโ ditty.
Not long after I got The Rise and Fall, I acquired the 7 album through mail order. My friends and I had discovered a company called Burning Airlines (still in business since 1978!) that sold music T-shirts and merch. We had sent away for their full catalog, and among the typewriter-keyed listings of import LPs I spotted โMadness 7.โ Iโm sure it must have cost even more than what Iโd shelled out for The Rise and Fall, but price could no longer deter me. I had to gain the one remaining โlostโ Madness album by any means necessary. I know one motivating factor was my OCD need for something to put on the blank side of my Rise and Fall tape. Less rewinding!
Once I finally got it transferred to the B-side of that cassette, I was generally more pleased with 7 at first blush than Iโd been with The Rise and Fall โ not least because it had a greater number of new-to-me tracks, a total of ten. And of the familiar ones, two were different mixes. Compared to the Geffen Madness album, โCardiac Arrestโ was shorter and โShut Upโ was longer. In both cases I prefer the extended outro versions. I became an instant fan of โTomorrowโs Dreamโ (nothing at all like the Black Sabbath song), โBenny Bullfrogโ (favored among my friends that I tried to convert to Madness), and โThe Opium Eatersโ (proof that the band could really do a brilliant film soundtrack). Iโve always thought โDay on the Townโ is underrated and deceptively chilling, a dub-tinged spiritual cousin to The Specialsโ โGhost Town.โ
One particular track holds dark personal memories for me. When was in my first fender-bender as a newly licensed young driver, 7 was playing in my Oldsmobile Cutlass tape deck. I got rear-ended on the highway, and just as I braked to a screeching halt, the opening bars of โSign of the Timesโ chimed out, Barsonโs plonked keys taunting โding-ding-ding, ding-ding-da-ding!โ at me like a game-show loser alarm. I couldnโt bear to listen to 7 for months from the PTSD flashbacks.
Another thing I have to mention about 7 is the album cover. I still think itโs the best artwork on any Madness album ever, even better than the iconic nutty train. On the Divine Madness DVD commentary track, Chas and Mike argue about which one of them choreographed the 7 pose, which reminds me of a superhero team splash page. In fact, I had a poster of it on my bedroom wall since I first became a Madness fan, which surely predisposed me to like the album once I finally got it. And I love the inner sleeve with the 7ร7 checkerboard grid of famous sevens, septets and sevenths: the 7 deadly sins, the 7 wonders of the world, the 7 seas, Seven Samurai, 7Upโฆ so awesome! As I had done with The Rise and Fall, I finagled this album into another school assignment by drawing a detailed pencil study of that epic 7 cover. Poor Mrs. Williams also had to grade me on a rendering of Big Countryโs Stuart Adamson in pastels, and a giant mural painting of Beta Ray Bill from The Mighty Thor.
Once I got my first CD player in 1987 as a college freshman, I was able to track down all the Madness albums on import CDs within a couple of years. And boy, did 7 and The Rise and Fall benefit from crystal clarity in place of the snap, crackle, pop of my LP recordings. Vinyl, I still hate your guts. But I thank you for making some important introductions and lasting connections in my life. To paraphrase that song that heckled me at the terrifying instant of my first car wreck:
This is disposable, throw it away This is on vinyl, donโt let it play That was the past, so leave it behind I found the music, itโs all in my mind
To no surprise, the Madness U.S. tour dates scheduled for May 2020 have been pushed to next year. The newly announced 2021 dates are as follows:
5/26/2021
Hammerstein Ballroom, New York, NY
5/28/2021
House of Blues, Boston, MA
5/30/2021
The Greek Theatre, Los Angeles, CA
5/31/2021
Punk Rock Bowling & Music Festival, Las Vegas, NV
6/2/2021 6/3/2021
The Fox Theater, Oakland, CA
Tickets booked for the 2020 dates will be honored at the rescheduled shows. The Madness Facebook page advises contacting your point of purchase if you will be unable to attend.
Everyone stay safe and stay tuned to Stateside Madness for any further updates as they become available!
UPDATE: On April 13, Madness was confirmed for the Las Vegas festival date added above.